<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>How To Split An Atom - Latest Comments in There Is No Point</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://sbspalding.disqus.com/there_is_no_point_70/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:53:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: There Is No Point</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/there-is-no-point/#comment-122812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you hit the nail on the head there. The next "stage" of the web is when it finally becomes a Utility and crosses over into the mainstream. The interesting question will be what we will gain and lose as a result. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sbspalding</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:53:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There Is No Point</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/there-is-no-point/#comment-99313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe web 2 refers less to web products &amp;amp; more to people &amp;amp; an era.  Web 2 was the era when virtually everyone became web users &amp;amp; web use acquired a significant role in everyday life. The explosion of the social networking &amp;amp; fun sites was the direct consequence of this. The subsequent stages are when the excitement &amp;amp; the novelty wears off, the influx of activity settles down &amp;amp; the web finds its place in conjunction to other activities.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maggy Young</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:29:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There Is No Point</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/there-is-no-point/#comment-96702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree web 2.0 really does not make much sense and I keep asking myself what is web 2.0. I have clients that say they want a website designed web 2.0. Over time design has changed and what they actually want is the latest layout. I think it has very little to do with what people believe is web 2.0&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pain Management</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:34:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There Is No Point</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/there-is-no-point/#comment-95455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"The problem isn’t necessarily that these products aren’t safe, it’s that they work against behavior that has been hardwired into our psyche."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think this is a great point. I'm amazed that certain sites think you'll willingly hand over so much personal information. (Mint in particular).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:24:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There Is No Point</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/there-is-no-point/#comment-94204</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, and I don't care what the 'purists' say, I just enjoy the design elements common to the Web 2.0 movement.  Give me big fonts, lots of white space, and a clear message.  No more of that 4 or 5 columns of 6 point font crammed in so tight you need a magnifying glass to decipher it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lochaber Local</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:20:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>