3 comments

• 

  Mark@CreditCards

  2 years ago

  I have to say evaluating is so important. I think that people have an idea, but they haven't clearly identify it. I also believe that there is a lot of info overload. I think it hurts our society because we get caught up in a lot of pointless nothing that is not helping us to get anywhere with our time. It is funny how when we have more freedom, we can still be just as trapped.
  reply
• 

  Szavanna

  2 years ago

  Hi Steve, thanks very much for the mention.
  
  Very interesting topic really - since web 2.0, web 3.0 determine more and more people's lives in so many ways.
  
  Since the start of the OpenCafe project I have been learning a lot about the way open source software is created and being improved on, how Wikipedians write & edit the pages of the Wikipedia, how musicians use ccMixter.org to remix each others music.
  
  What I wonder about is - whether we can look at this as a process where things become 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 etc. supposing that there is nothing to be said about the time before 1.0, the time before the Internet - and also thinking that we continuously evolve and everything that we do now is better quality than the concepts, ways of living of past societies. I think the present modern world has forgotten a lot of the of the wisdom of times before - "conversational knowledge sharing" was always there - and it'd be interesting to read a comparison between today's web 2.0 concept and the various ways of knowledge sharing through history - and use the conclusions in shaping web 3.0.
  
  Thanks again for the interview - great answers that hopefully will get a lot of people thinking about this topic.
  reply
• 

  Jitendra

  1 year ago

  Hey Great Blog...In my mind Web2.0 is about empowering users...Its really enabling a Read as well as a Write operation on the web...
  reply