<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>How To Split An Atom - Latest Comments in Donation Dashboard: Colloborative Charity Filter</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://sbspalding.disqus.com/donation_dashboard_colloborative_charity_filter_43/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:11:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Donation Dashboard: Colloborative Charity Filter</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/ideas/donation-dashboard-colloborative-charity-filter/#comment-891806</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. It's really nice to see how much of your money is going to bureaucracy. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sbspalding</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:11:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Donation Dashboard: Colloborative Charity Filter</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/ideas/donation-dashboard-colloborative-charity-filter/#comment-888831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Donation dashboard is good because it shows you the "efficiency" for each organization.  It shows you that if you donate to a group like second harvest 95% of your donation will go to help those in need.  Compared to some of the other groups at 74% (no names).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Business networking</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:00:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Donation Dashboard: Colloborative Charity Filter</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/ideas/donation-dashboard-colloborative-charity-filter/#comment-886871</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Which leads me to believe there has to be a more effective way to raise funds. Especially now that marketing channels are so open, it seems ludicrous that fund raisers would have this much sway.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am certain there are tons of fundraisers out there that are worth their fees, but those fundraisers likely charge reasonable fees.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Free idea for the ether - How do we use social media to help raise funds for causes? Kiva? Fundable? Anything for larger scale funding?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sbspalding</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:34:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Donation Dashboard: Colloborative Charity Filter</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/ideas/donation-dashboard-colloborative-charity-filter/#comment-886813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Los Angeles Times had a brilliant article on charity giving, and where the money goes.&lt;b&gt; For-profit fundraisers collect loads, but nonprofits see a sliver&lt;/b&gt;By Charles Piller and Doug Smith, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers&lt;br&gt;July 6, 2008&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/566x2v" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/566x2v"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/566x2v&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From the article:&lt;br&gt;* More than 100 charities raised $1 million or more from commercial appeals but netted less than 25 cents per dollar. Fundraisers got the rest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;* In 430 campaigns, charities got nothing: All $44 million donated went to fundraisers. In 337 of those cases, charities actually lost money, paying fees to fundraisers that exceeded the amount raised.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;* In hundreds of other campaigns, charities apparently entered into contracts that limited their share of donations to 20% or less, no matter how successful the campaign.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ophelia_chong</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:27:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>