<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>How To Split An Atom - Latest Comments in Blogosphere: The Enquirer For Geeks</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:41:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Blogosphere: The Enquirer For Geeks</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/blogosphere-the-enquirer-for-geeks/#comment-13017</link><description>Dawn's insight is probably more spot on than any of us would like to admit. Though her final paragraph is also worth considering. No matter how silly the scuffles we do find a way to move the conversation forward. There is something to that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sbspalding</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:41:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere: The Enquirer For Geeks</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/blogosphere-the-enquirer-for-geeks/#comment-13004</link><description>Here's how one outsider sees us.  Not a very attractive picture, I'm afraid.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://dawnkey.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/the-tech-vomiters/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://dawnkey.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/the-tec...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark T</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:14:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere: The Enquirer For Geeks</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/blogosphere-the-enquirer-for-geeks/#comment-12931</link><description>There have been on and off rumors of the Wikipedia folks getting into search, if they managed to pull it off it would be fantastic. But I'll believe it when I see it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sbspalding</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:25:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere: The Enquirer For Geeks</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/blogosphere-the-enquirer-for-geeks/#comment-12928</link><description>No problem at all mate. :) Yea, funny how that works.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sbspalding</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:24:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere: The Enquirer For Geeks</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/blogosphere-the-enquirer-for-geeks/#comment-12805</link><description>Hey thanks for the note. My oversight entirely. And thank you for noticing that the main polemic continues to go unaddressed by most of the commenters. ;P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:27:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere: The Enquirer For Geeks</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/blogosphere-the-enquirer-for-geeks/#comment-12593</link><description>Andrew I linked back to your blog and I linked to Jason's blog. I didn't link to Mahalo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sbspalding</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:46:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere: The Enquirer For Geeks</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/blogosphere-the-enquirer-for-geeks/#comment-12564</link><description>Interesting. I would suggest that you were trying to act as a point of reason with this post, and take a journalistic approach, but clearly your linking practices (for deciding to link to Mahalo and not Rocketboom), is the sign that your NOT taking a journalistic stance, but rather taking a sides on a political platform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thus, your argument broke down for me and I became disinterested in reading any further. . .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:18:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere: The Enquirer For Geeks</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/blogosphere-the-enquirer-for-geeks/#comment-12467</link><description>Interesting point. I  didn't know that about the head butting between Jason &amp; Andrew.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another human based search engine is &lt;a href="http://ChaCha.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;ChaCha.com&lt;/a&gt;. They just 10mil in funding.&lt;br&gt;However I have heard that the CEO/founder of wikipedia is looking to get involved with the search engine market.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Already most of the results from google include a link to wikipedia within the 1st page. So there is a market out there for wikipedia to get involved with.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Schmidt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:42:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>