http://sbspalding.disqus.com/enMon, 02 Jun 2008 04:56:32 -0000http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/ariel-twitter-and-who-is-holding-our-hands/#comment-570937My final question is what do you think the place is for a owners of a communication platform? Should they define and dictate the discussions that are allowed to go on over their channel, or should they empower users to do it themselves?ersinceMon, 02 Jun 2008 04:56:32 -0000http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/ariel-twitter-and-who-is-holding-our-hands/#comment-540783I'd say a last resort of banning should be in place for those you defined as using their accounts primarily for abuse, ie. the nutheads whose main or only intention is to be a wrecker - becaus you're always going to get some of those somewhere at some time. For the rest, users should be allowed to protect themselves with blocking tools. Arguments & disagreements are one thing, but users don't want to find some idiot has made them a target & gets satisfaction from hurling unreasonable abuse at them, continuously upsetting them from a distance, & there is nothing that can be done about it. Web stalking should be recognised as being a real offence as it belatedly has been in real life.Maggy YoungWed, 28 May 2008 07:06:30 -0000