<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>How To Split An Atom - Latest Comments in A Case Study In Practical Technology Use</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:20:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A Case Study In Practical Technology Use</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/a-case-study-in-practical-technology-use/#comment-10172</link><description>There is the trick, isn't it? Features are great for keeping people interested in a product they already know how to use, but you can't get them there in the first place unless the biggest value is dead simple.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sbspalding</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:20:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Case Study In Practical Technology Use</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/a-case-study-in-practical-technology-use/#comment-9895</link><description>Great observations!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm a Crackberry addict so I can definitely recommend one (the Curve is wonderfully engineered little gadget).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm an ex- software engineer and can attest that unless they (engineers) are reigned in by someone more practical they will over-engineer something with a lot of useful features that have the unintuitive effect of making the end product less usable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">robneville73</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:15:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>